Wettbewerbe für Architekten und Ingenieure, Landschaftsarchitekten, Architektur Studenten Wettbewerbe für Architekten und Ingenieure, Landschaftsarchitekten, Architektur Studenten
X

NEU: Bitte beachten Sie, dass Sie sich ab sofort mit E-Mail und Passwort einloggen.

Passwort erneuern
Neu registrieren

  • New Stadium
  • New Stadium
  • New Stadium
  • New Stadium
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ

New Stadium , Aarhus/ Dänemark

Architektur Wettbewerbs-Ergebnis

wa-ID
wa-2032803
Tag der Veröffentlichung
29.10.2021
Aktualisiert am
16.01.2023
Verfahrensart
Nicht offener Wettbewerb
Zulassungsbereich
EU /EWR
Teilnehmer
Architekt*innen und Ingenieur*innen
Beteiligung
6 Arbeiten
Auslober
Bewerbungsschluss
30.11.2021
Preisgerichtssitzung
14.12.2022

Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt

Project Team: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead), SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering), TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local)

Design: Zaha Hadid Architects (ZHA)
ZHA Project Director: Gianluca Racana · Ludovico Lombardi
ZHA Project Leads: Subharthi Guha · Jakub Klaska · Paolo Zilli
ZHA Competition Team: Andy Lin · Charles Harris · Dieter Matuschke
Jinhee Koh · Kyle Dunnington · Luca Melchiori · Maria Laura · Michael Forward
Matthew Gabe · Nastasja Mitrovic · Sara Criscenti · Valentina Cerrone · Yuzhi Xu
ZHA Sustainability Team: Carlos Sousa-Martinez · Bahaa Alnassrallah
Aditya Ambare · Aleksander Mastalski

Local Architect and Engineer: SWECO, Denmark
Sweco Project Director Engineering: Frands Andersen
Sweco Project Director Architecture: Peter Kristiansen
Sweco Cost Manager: Jens Højgaard
Sweco Architecture Team: Tim Nørlund · Tina Lind · Eiwen Ying · Søren Vestbjerg Andersen
Thomas Stub Naylor · Lene Kristensen · Bo Boi
Sweco Engineering Team: Bruno Bjerre · Anton Møller Christensen · Søren Pedersen
Bent Greve · Martin Hougaard · Helle Wøhlk Sørensen · Steffen Alstrup Haagensen
Kjetil Birkeland Moe · Kasper Støttrup · Lars Schäfer
Sweco Sustainability Team: Allan Hesselholt · Mads Funder Larsen

Landscape Architect: TREDJE NATUR APS
Tredje Natur Project Director: Ole Schrøder
Tredje Natur Senior Project Manager: Mette Fast
Tredje Natur Team Members: Sofie Askholm Ibsen · Kirstine Lorentsen
Kasper Havemann · Adrianna Trybuchowicz · Lucija Belinic · Philip McKay
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ
  • Gewinner | zur Bearbeitung ausgewählt: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead) · SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering) · TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local) | Visualisierung: © Negativ

Gewinner

Project Team: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)
  • Gewinner: Cobe (DK), AFL Architects (UK), Buro Happold (DK)

Gewinner

Project Team: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE),
Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)
  • Gewinner: Dorte Mandrup (DK), Kristine Jensen Landskab & Arkitektur (DK), Schlaich Bergermann Partner (DE), Birkmose Consulting, AGN (DE), Søren Jensen Rådgivende Ingeniørfirma (DK)

Weiterer Teilnehmer

Project Team: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP),
MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: Dissing + Weitling (DK), Kengo Kuma & Associates (JP), MASU planning Aps, MOONN, Arup (DE), Walt Galmarini (CH)

Weiterer Teilnehmer

Project Team: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: SCAU (FR), Arkitema (DK), LYTT Architecture, COWI (DK), Buro Happold (UK)

Weiterer Teilnehmer

Project Team: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
  • Weiterer Teilnehmer: 3XN Architects (DK), HKS Architects (US), Schønherr, MOE, Arup (DK)
Wettbewerbsaufgabe
Aarhus wächst schnell und hat sich in den letzten Jahren zu einer Großstadt mit kompakteren Stadtgebieten entwickelt. Wir haben einen starken Fokus auf Nachhaltigkeit und die Bedeutung der Grünflächen der Stadt in diesem Transformationsprozess. Es ist gerade die Kombination aus städtischem Leben, städtischer Natur, Wäldern und Stränden, die viele Menschen an Aarhus schätzen.

Die New Yorker haben ihren Central Park und die Berliner ihren Tiergarten. Kongelunden gehört seit mehr als hundert Jahren zu Aarhus und bietet mit seinem herrlichen Blick auf die Bucht von Aarhus, den alten Wäldern, den Grabhügeln, den Fahrgeschäften, den Spielplätzen, dem Sportpark und dem Fußballstadion den Rahmen für das gute Leben und einige unserer schönsten Momente.

Dank der großzügigen Spenden von The Salling Foundations und Lind Invest sowie der politischen und wirtschaftlichen Unterstützung durch einen vereinigten Stadtrat stehen wir nun vor der Aufgabe, die Kongelunden von morgen zu definieren.

Unter Berücksichtigung der historischen und natürlichen Qualitäten des Gebiets und auf der Grundlage eines engen Dialogs mit den Nutzern und Interessengruppen des Gebiets werden wir daran arbeiten, das Potenzial von Kongelunden auszuschöpfen und das Gebiet zu erschließen. Alle Aarhusianer und Besucher der Stadt sollen in Kongelunden sinnvolle Aktivitäten und Gemeinschaften finden können. Und wo wir mit Stolz ein wunderschönes und bahnbrechendes neues Fußballstadion sowie die anderen Sportfunktionen genießen können.

Die Stadtverwaltung von Aarhus lädt daher mit großer Freude Architekten und Ingenieure ein, an dem Wettbewerb für das neue Stadion in Aarhus in Kongelunden teilzunehmen. Es handelt sich um einen Wettbewerb, der für künftige Generationen und die Entwicklung der gesamten Stadt Aarhus von entscheidender Bedeutung sein wird.

Competition assignment
Aarhus is growing rapidly and has in recent years been changing into a large city with more compact urban areas. We have a strong focus on sustainability and the importance of the city's green spaces in this transformation process. It is precisely the combination of urban life, urban nature, forestry and beaches that many people appreciate about Aarhus.

New Yorkers have their Central park and Berliners their Tiergarten. Kongelunden has been part of Aarhus for more than a hundred years, and its magnificent view of the Bay of Aarhus, ancient forests, burial mounds, fairground rides, playgrounds, sports park and football stadium provide the framework for the good life and some of our greatest moments.

Thanks to generous donations from The Salling Foundations and Lind Invest, as well as political and economic support from a unified city council, we are now faced with the task of defining tomorrow’s Kongelunden.

In respect of the area's historical and natural qualities, and on the basis of a close dialogue with the area's users and stakeholders, we will work to realize Kongelunden's potential and open up the area. All Aarhusians and visitors to the city shall be able to find meaningful activities and communities in Kongelunden. And where we can proudly enjoy a beautiful and ground-breaking new football stadium, as well as the other sports functions.

Therefore it is with great pleasure that Aarhus Municipality hereby invites architects and engineers to participate in the design contest for the New Stadium in Aarhus in Kongelunden. It is a contest that will be of crucial importance for future generations and the development of the whole of Aarhus.

Jury
Jacob Bundsgaard, Mayor, the Municipality of Aarhus (chairman)
Metin Lindved Ayden, Council member, Culture and Public Services
Nicolaj Bang, Council member, Technology and Environment
Jens Bjerg Sørensen, chairman of the board of directors of Salling Fondene
Henrik Lind, CEO of Lind Invest
Christian Budde, member of political following group
Mette Bjerre, member of political following group
Anne Mette Boye, Municipal architect, Municipality of Aarhus
Trine Berthold, Project Manager of New Stadium in Aarhus, the Secretariat of Kongelunden
Bjarne Hammer, Architect and member of the Danish Association of Architects, specialist juror
Martin Krogh, Architect and member of the Danish Association of Architects, specialist juror

Empfehlung der Jury
Drei Projektvorschläge - von Zaha Hadid Architects, Cobe und Dorte Mandrup - waren so überzeugend, dass die Jury beschloss, sie alle zu gleichberechtigten Gewinnern des Wettbewerbs zu erklären. Sie gingen im Herbst 2022 in eine Verhandlungsrunde, in der die drei Vorschläge im Dialog mit einem Verhandlungsausschuss bearbeitet wurden. Dieser Prozess führte am 14. Dezember 2022 zur Auswahl der Skovens Arena von Zaha Hadid als Gewinner.

Recommendation of the jury
Three project proposals - from Zaha Hadid Architects, Cobe and Dorte Mandrup - were so strong that the judging panel chose to declare them all equal winners of the competition. They went forward to a negotiated tender round in autumn 2022, where the three proposals were worked on in dialogue with a negotiating committee. It was this process that, on 14 December 2022, resulted in the selection of Zaha Hadid's Skovens Arena as the winner.



Press release by Zaha Hadid Architects

Zaha Hadid Architects, Sweco and Tredje Natur to design new Aarhus Stadium

Aarhus, Denmark

The team comprising Zaha Hadid Architects working with architecture and engineering consultancy Sweco and landscape architects Tredje Natur has won the competition to build the new Aarhus football stadium in Denmark.

Bringing supporters as close as possible to the field of play in a single-tiered seating bowl creating an intense match-day experience, the new Aarhus Stadium is embedded within the city’s Marselisborg forest.

Titled the “Arena of the Forest”, the design concept is informed by the vertical rhythm of the surrounding trees that reach up to 47m in height. The design envisions the new stadium as an extension of the forest with its verticality continued in the stadium’s public colonnades and the timber ribs of its façade. These vertical gestures flow from the forest towards the landscaped plaza and into the colonnades of the stadium’s external and internal concourses. Together with an intricate hierarchy of timber ribs within the façade and roof, the stadium’s large horizontal volume is subdivided into a human scale whilst at the same time offering a sense of arrival for the fans congregating in the adjacent public plazas.

The new stadium’s roof is designed to maximise weather protection and increase comfort levels in the adjacent external plazas as well as the internal concourses, defining a sheltered 360-degree public circulation route that is independent from the events within the stadium; creating welcoming new public spaces for a wide variety of civic, recreational and cultural uses by the local community and visitors to the park.

The stadium’s transparent roof and the gaps within the timber ribs of its façade reveal glimpses of the surrounding forest, while its permeable colonnades blur the boundaries between different programmes. The east and west sides incorporate open colonnades that act not only as intuitive wayfinding to demark the main entrances, but also as an interface between public events and ticketed programmes; allowing the two to expand into one another and maximise the potential to host many different type of events 365 days a year.

To be built on the site of the existing stadium, the new project’s design, structure, and materials are optimized with regards to environmental impact, functionality and experienced value. In using the right materials for the right function, and reducing quantities to the absolute minimum where strength and robustness add the greatest possible value, the new Aarhus Stadium is characterized by three primary materials: concrete incorporating recycled aggregates for the columns; locally procured, upcycled and recycled steel for the trusses; and timber from local certified sustainable sources for the façade cladding.

The adjacent 'Stadionhallerne' building completed in 1918 by architect Axel Høgh-Hansen will be refurbished. Its intense red facades and white ornamentation will be retained to keep its historic soul that everyone at the club holds dear.

The design and construction of the new building is driven by the recycling and reuse of the existing stadium’s materials and components to the largest extent possible. In addition to the positive effect on the new stadium’s environmental impact, the reutilization of the old stadium’s components will contribute to the local anchoring of the project.

Home ground to Aarhus Gymnastikforening (AGF) football club whose first team play in the Danish Superliga, the current Aarhus Stadium opened in 1920. While a series of refurbishments were undertaken between 1948 and 2004, the existing stadium no longer meets the standards required to host regular top-flight professional and international football matches as well as large-scale cultural events. Perhaps most notably for AGF supporters, the long distances between spectators and the football pitch within the existing stadium are an obstacle to generating the most exciting atmosphere for AGF players and fans at home games. The new stadium will bring fans very close to the field of play, creating an immersive experience for everyone at the match.

The competition organizers praised the team’s proposal for its understanding and interpretation of the stadium’s special location within the ancient Marselisborg forest and its adjacency to the historic Stadionhallerne: The strong manifestation of the winning project is inviting, reaching out to its surroundings and connecting well with the context.”

Gianluca Racana, director of Zaha Hadid Architects said: “It is an honor to have been selected to build such an important project in Aarhus. Our proposal for the new Aarhus Stadium is inspired by its natural forest context and the club’s legacy. Providing a wealth of new public spaces for use 365 days a year, the stadium will be a new landmark for the city that incorporates the highest standards of environmental, economic, and social sustainability within in every aspect of its design and construction.”

Peter Kristiansen, case architect of Sweco said: “The new Aarhus Stadium aims to become a catalyst for fans and the local community, a new identity for the club, and a new landmark on the national and international football fraternity. We are thrilled to be awarded this prestigious project. We see it as a recognition of our local presence in the city and our understanding of the uniqueness of the place, the context, and the soul and identity connected to AGF and Aarhus. With our partners we have designed a stadium that fits into the environment and with a Nordic profile. The stadium is carefully designed, and I guarantee that there will be a great experience from every seat.”

Ole Schrøder, partner in Tredje Natur said: “Our proposal is celebrating the proud spirit of the club and its importance for the City of Aarhus. Paying tribute to both the architectural heritage on site and the unique nature that surrounds it will serve as a welcoming gesture to the public. On any occasion!”

42 Danish and international architect teams applied for prequalification for the tender in December 2021, and six teams were chosen for the first round of the competition with three equal winners continuing to the second round. The winner of the competition was announced by the City of Aarhus as developer, as well as the two sponsors behind the majority of the financing, Lind Invest and Salling Fondene, and the local Superliga club AGF Football.

The winning proposal will now be qualified during the first half of 2023 in collaboration between the City of Aarhus, the winning team and AGF. Parallel to that process, the contractor who will be responsible for the construction of the new stadium will be found. In the second half of 2023, the construction will be planned in detail, before the current stadium begins to be gradually dismantled beginning in 2024. The construction phase will proceed over four stages towards the expected inauguration of a new stadium during 2026.



Project Team

Client:
The Municipality of Aarhus
Project Team: Zaha Hadid Architects (Lead), SWECO Danmark (Local and Engineering), TREDJE NATUR APS (Landscape and Local)

Design: Zaha Hadid Architects (ZHA)
ZHA Project Director: Gianluca Racana, Ludovico Lombardi
ZHA Project Leads: Subharthi Guha, Jakub Klaska, Paolo Zilli
ZHA Competition Team: Andy Lin, Charles Harris, Dieter Matuschke, Jinhee Koh, Kyle Dunnington, Luca Melchiori, Maria Laura,
Michael Forward, Matthew Gabe, Nastasja Mitrovic, Sara Criscenti, Valentina Cerrone, Yuzhi Xu
ZHA Sustainability Team: Carlos Sousa- Martinez, Bahaa Alnassrallah, Aditya Ambare, Aleksander Mastalski

Local Architect and Engineer: SWECO, Denmark
Sweco Project Director Engineering: Frands Andersen
Sweco Project Director Architecture: Peter Kristiansen
Sweco Cost Manager: Jens Højgaard
Sweco Architecture Team: Tim Nørlund , Tina Lind, Eiwen Ying, Søren Vestbjerg Andersen, Thomas Stub Naylor , Lene Kristensen, Bo Boi
Sweco Engineering Team: Bruno Bjerre, Anton Møller Christensen, Søren Pedersen, Bent Greve, Martin Hougaard, Helle Wøhlk Sørensen,
Steffen Alstrup Haagensen, Kjetil Birkeland Moe, Kasper Støttrup, Lars Schäfer
Sweco Sustainability Team: Allan Hesselholt, Mads Funder Larsen

Landscape Architect: TREDJE NATUR APS
Tredje Natur Project Director: Ole Schrøder
Tredje Natur Senior Project Manager: Mette Fast
Tredje Natur Team Members: Sofie Askholm Ibsen, Kirstine Lorentsen, Kasper Havemann, Adrianna Trybuchowicz, Lucija Belinic, Philip McKay
29/10/2021    S211
I.
II.
III.
IV.
VI.
Denmark-Aarhus: Architectural, engineering and planning services
 
2021/S 211-555956
 
Design contest notice
 
Legal Basis:
Directive 2014/24/EU
Section I: Contracting authority/entity
 
I.1)Name and addresses
Official name: Aarhus Kommune
 
National registration number: 55133018
 
Postal address: Rådhuspladsen 2
 
Town: Aarhus C
 
NUTS code: DK042 Østjylland
 
Postal code: 8000
 
Country: Denmark
 
Contact person: Kongelundens Sekretariat ved Trine Berthold
 
 
Telephone: +45 20300988
 
Internet address(es):
 
I.3)Communication
The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at: rib-software.dk/udbudsportal
Additional information can be obtained from the abovementioned address
Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted to the abovementioned address
I.4)Type of the contracting authority
Regional or local authority
I.5)Main activity
General public services
Section II: Object
 
II.1)Scope of the procurement
II.1.1)Title:
 
 
New Stadium in Aarhus
 
Reference number: TN361794A
II.1.2)Main CPV code
71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services
II.2)Description
II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services
II.2.4)Description of the procurement:
 
 
Vision Kongelunden is an ambitious urban development project located in the middle of Aarhus. Kongelunden houses multiple major sports facilities and attractions and is uniquely situated in the scenic area connecting Aarhus Bay and the Marselisborg Woods.
 
As part of the development of the large recreational area a beautiful and groundbreaking football stadium will be built in Aarhus at the present location near Aarhus Idrætspark to the benefit and pleasure of the many.
 
By "beautiful and groundbreakting" is meant:
 
• that a new football stadium is part of a unit with a focus on quality, coherence and understanding of the area's cultural history as well as the landscape and urban location
 
• that a new stadium has high architectural quality of professional international standing
 
• that creates a new and very intense stadium experience in connection with football
 
• that the stadium must be a modern and intimate football stadium that complies with UEFA's category 4 requirements for international football, and at the same time can accommodate well-functioning facilities for many users and spectators - including being able to host concerts at a high international level, without compromising on its primary function as a football stadium.
 
By “for the benefit and joy of the many” is meant:
 
• high quality in all users' experiences at the stadium
 
• high accessibility and openness to the stadium and surrounding area
 
• possibility of using the stadium and surrounding area in everyday life.
 
The stadium seating capacity for football matches is expected to be between 20,000 and 25,000 spectators.
 
The new stadium in Aarhus is currently expected to be opened on 1 July 2026.
 
With the object of finding a full-service consultant to plan all the architectural and engineering tasks in connection with the new stadium, the Municipality of Aarhus is launching a design contest. The primary task in the design contest is to deliver a visionary proposal for a new football stadium and to show how the stadium interacts with its surroundings and the neighbouring facilities in the surrounding area and to show how the vision of a beautiful and groundbreaking stadium for the benefit and pleasure of the many may be accomplished.
 
The focus of the design contest is the composition of the football stadium with a connection to the location and the existing and surrounding stadium buildings worthy of preservation.
 
In continuation of the design contest, it is expected that a negotiated tender procedure without publication will be conducted with the winner or winners of the design contest with the object of entering into a full-service consultancy agreement.
 
The full-service consultant must in general plan the stadium on the basis of a stadium concept prepared by the stadium advisers connected to the employer's adviser (Rambøll and Transform): Trivandi, Sport Five and Core Five in cooperation with the Municipality of Aarhus and the football club AGF.
 
Concurrently with the invitation to tender in the design contest "New Stadium in Aarhus", tenders will be invited for a development plan for Kongelunden in a parallel assignment. It is presumed that continuous coordination between the two projects will take place following the conclusion of the contests.
 
For a further description of the urban development project Vision Kongelunden and the sub-project "New Stadium in Aarhus", reference is made to the project description, which may be found at Byggeweb, see clause I.3.
 
II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
Section III: Legal, economic, financial and technical information
 
III.1)Conditions for participation
III.1.10)Criteria for the selection of participants:
 
 
The participants in the design contest must meet the following minimum requirements:
 
• The applicant must have had a pre-tax profit in two of the past three financial years.
 
• The applicant must have a solvency ratio of a minimum of 20% in the most recently concluded financial year.
 
• The applicant must have a minimum of one reference (case study) involving full-service consultancy services for a construction project with a capital sum of EUR 14m, which has been commenced or concluded within the past three calendar years.
 
If the application to participate is submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must meet the minimum requirements regarding pre-tax profit and solvency ratio.
 
Applicants, including a participant in an association submitting an application, must not be subject to any of the grounds for exclusion set out in ss 135-137 of the Danish Public Procurement Act (udbudsloven) (see appendix 1 to the prequalification documents).
 
The participants in the design contest will be selected among the applicants meeting the above minimum requirements on the basis of an assessment of the applicants' qualifications in the areas of architecture and landscape architecture in the form of:
 
a) experience developing and planning innovative, ground-breaking and robust architecture with international stature, including as a full-service consultant
 
b) experience from construction projects of a high complexity within sports and culture
 
c) experience integrating design
 
d) experience developing architecture in a cultural historical environment, including links between historical and new buildings
 
e) experience with architecture with a broad sustainability focus
 
f) experience with focusing on the overall financial situation and financial management while operating within a fixed financial framework
 
g) experience with partnering collaboration and project development (early invitation to tender for construction work)
 
New experience (references/case studies) are given a higher weight than older experience (references/case studies).
 
It will be given positive weight in the assessment if multiple of the above-mentioned disciplines (a-g) are included in the same reference/case study (project).
 
If more than 5-6 applicants have qualifications that are almost equal, it will in the selection of the final participants in the design contest be taken into account whether – and if so to what extent – the applicant's qualifications relate to construction work with the same characteristics as the new stadium of the Municipality of Aarhus.
 
See section VI.3) regarding requirements for the applications.
 
Section IV: Procedure
 
IV.1)Description
IV.1.2)Type of contest
Restricted
Minimum number: 5
Maximum number: 6
IV.1.7)Names of participants already selected:
IV.1.9)Criteria for the evaluation of projects:
 
 
The winner of the design contest will be selected on the basis of one overall assessment of the following criteria:
 
- Architecture and functionality
 
Weight will be attributed to
 
• "New Stadium in Aarhus" appearing as a ground-breaking and beautiful building with international stature and quality.
 
• the holistic solution of the design proposal in relation to the surroundings to a high degree taking into account the cultural historical environment.
 
• "New Stadium in Aarhus" having insight into and an understanding of creating optimum fan and football experiences.
 
• the project being characterised by integrated design with realisable and value-creating sustainability solutions.
 
- Technology and the environment
 
Weight will be given to the proposal's quality and concepts in the areas of sustainability and technical solutions as well as the capability of execution taking into account the framework of the construction economics, and that the proposal is robust enough for scaling in relation to and in terms of future adjustments to the financial framework.
 
Weight will furthermore be given to optimizing of the operating costs of the proposal in terms of selection of materials and technical solutions.
 
- Consulting fee
 
Weight will be given to the fee rates offered, which are to be as low as possible within a realistic framework in respect of the performance specification.
 
IV.2)Administrative information
IV.2.2)Time limit for receipt of projects or requests to participate
Date: 30/11/2021
Local time: 12:00
IV.2.3)Date of dispatch of invitations to participate to selected candidates
Date: 14/12/2021
IV.2.4)Languages in which projects or requests to participate may be drawn up:
English
IV.3)Rewards and jury
IV.3.1)Information about prize(s)
A prize/prizes will be awarded: no
IV.3.2)Details of payments to all participants:
 
 
All participants in the design contest submitting in due time a compliant project proposal will receive a fee of EUR 50,000 exclusive of VAT.
 
IV.3.3)Follow-up contracts
Any service contract following the contest will be awarded to the winner or winners of the contest: yes
IV.3.4)Decision of the jury
The decision of the jury is binding on the contracting authority/entity: yes
IV.3.5)Names of the selected members of the jury:
Section VI: Complementary information
 
VI.3)Additional information:
 
 
For use in the selection of the participants for the design contest, the applications must include the following:
 
1) Description of the team behind the application, including company name, address, telephone and company no. of all participants in the team as well as the role intended for each individual participant in the team behind the application.
 
2) Description of the applicant's motivation to participate in the design contest (1 page).
 
3) Financial statements for the three most recently concluded financial years for all participants in the team behind the application.
 
4) Signed solemn statement from each participant in the team behind the application to the effect that the participant in question is not subject to one of the grounds for exclusion in ss 135-137 of the Public Procurement Act.
 
5) List of references (case studies) accounting for the applicant's references in the disciplines indicated in items a-g in section III.1.10 above. A maximum of three references (case studies) may be enclosed for each discipline (a-g). The references (case studies) must indicate who in the team has the reference, customer, size and construction economics, size of the consulting assignment (scope and/or fee) as well as execution period and stage of the project.
 
If the application for participation in the design contest is submitted by a team (consortium), the application must include:
 
6) A declaration signed by all participants in the consortium from which it appears that the participants have unlimited and joint and several liability for the tender and any subsequent contract awarded. It must also appear from the declaration which of the participants in the consortium is authorised to bind the association.
 
To the extent a participating applicant bases its application on the skills of sub-consultants, the application for participation must also include:
 
7) A declaration signed by the sub-consultant in question from which it appears that the sub-consultant will make its skills available to the applicant if the contract is awarded to the applicant.
 
Engineering qualifications are not included in the assessment of the application and thereby not in the selection of the participants for the design contest. The participants are, however, expected to attach the required engineering qualifications in connection with the preparation of their design proposal. The Municipality of Aarhus's expectations regarding engineering qualifications will be sent to the participants in the contest when they have been selected.
 
Should the Municipality of Aarhus pursuant to s. 82 of the Public Procurement Act decide to conduct a negotiated tender procedure with the winner or winners of the design contest, the negotiations may at the discretion of the participant take place in Danish or in English, just as tenders may at the discretion of the participant be submitted in Danish or in English. The project language will be Danish.
 
VI.4)Procedures for review
VI.4.1)Review body
Official name: Klagenævnet for Udbud
 
Postal address: Nævnenes Hus, Toldboden 2
 
Town: Viborg
 
Postal code: 8800
 
Country: Denmark
 
 
Telephone: +45 72405600
 
Internet address: www.klfu.dk
VI.4.3)Review procedure
Precise information on deadline(s) for review procedures:
 
 
According to Consolidation Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016 on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following complaints deadlines apply in relation to inviting tenders:
 
Complaints about not obtaining prequalification must be received by the Complaints Board no later than 20 calendar days after the day on which the contracting authority has announced who has obtained prequalification.
 
Complaints regarding the tender procedure must be received by the Complaints Board for Public Procurement no later than 45 calendar days after the day on which the contracting authority has published an announcement in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that the contracting authority has entered into a contract.
 
The deadline is calculated from the day after the day on which the announcement was published.
 
No later than at the same time as a complaint is filed with the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the claimant must notify the contracting entity in writing that the complaint has been filed with the Complaints Board for Public Procurement and whether the complaint has been filed in the standstill period. In cases where the complaint has not been filed during the standstill period, the claimant must also indicate whether a stay of execution is requested in respect of the complaint.
 
A complaints fee of DKK 20,000 must be paid at the same time. For further information about the filing of complaints, please refer to the website of the Complaints Board for Public Procurement: www.klfu.dk.
 
VI.4.4)Service from which information about the review procedure may be obtained
Official name: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, Center for Udbudsregler
 
Postal address: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35
 
Town: Valby
 
Postal code: 2500
 
Country: Denmark
 
E-mail: kfst@kfst.dk
 
Telephone: +45 41715000
 
Internet address: www.kfst.dk/
VI.5)Date of dispatch of this notice:
27/10/2021

Weitere Ergebnisse zum Thema

Jetzt Abonnent werden um alle Bilder zu sehen

jetzt abonnieren

Schon wa Abonnent?
Bitte einloggen