- wa-ID
- wa-2024487
- Tag der Veröffentlichung
- 16.07.2018
- Aktualisiert am
- 06.09.2018
- Verfahrensart
- Offener Wettbewerb
- Zulassungsbereich
-
Andere
- Teilnehmer
- Architekten und Designer
- Auslober
- arch out loud
- Bewerbungsschluss
- 31.07.2018
- Abgabetermin
- 01.08.2018
- Preisgerichtssitzung
- 31.08.2018
Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht
Overall Winner
Studio Orzi, New York
Massimiliano Orzi
Projekt: Integrated Apparatus
Projekt: Integrated Apparatus
-
Overall Winner: Studio Orzi, New York
-
Overall Winner: Studio Orzi, New York
-
Overall Winner: Studio Orzi, New York
-
Overall Winner: Studio Orzi, New York
Innovation Award
Dazhong Yi, University of Pennsylvania
Projekt: Above the Tire
-
Innovation Award: Dazhong Yi, University of Pennsylvania
-
Innovation Award: Dazhong Yi, University of Pennsylvania
-
Innovation Award: Dazhong Yi, University of Pennsylvania
-
Innovation Award: Dazhong Yi, University of Pennsylvania
Adaptability Award
Stav Dror · Liran Messer, Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem
Projekt: The Not-For-Long Home
-
Adaptability Award: Stav Dror · Liran Messer, Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem
-
Adaptability Award: Stav Dror · Liran Messer, Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem
-
Adaptability Award: Stav Dror · Liran Messer, Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem
-
Adaptability Award: Stav Dror · Liran Messer, Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem
Pragmatic Award
Jacob Comerci, Princeton University School of Architecture
Projekt: Urbanism of Stuff
-
Pragmatic Award: Jacob Comerci, Princeton University School of Architecture
-
Pragmatic Award: Jacob Comerci, Princeton University School of Architecture
-
Pragmatic Award: Jacob Comerci, Princeton University School of Architecture
-
Pragmatic Award: Jacob Comerci, Princeton University School of Architecture
Lobende Erwähnung
Shin Shin, Santa Monica
Melissa Shin · Amanda Shin
Projekt: No Vacancy: Detroit
Projekt: No Vacancy: Detroit
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Shin Shin, Santa Monica
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Shin Shin, Santa Monica
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Shin Shin, Santa Monica
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Shin Shin, Santa Monica
Lobende Erwähnung
Pita & Bloom, Los Angeles
Jackilin Bloom · Florencia Pita
Projekt: Easy House
Projekt: Easy House
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Pita & Bloom, Los Angeles
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Pita & Bloom, Los Angeles
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Pita & Bloom, Los Angeles
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Pita & Bloom, Los Angeles
Lobende Erwähnung
Bryce Taylor · Adin Rimland, Pratt Institute, New York
Projekt: Under One Roof
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Bryce Taylor · Adin Rimland, Pratt Institute, New York
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Bryce Taylor · Adin Rimland, Pratt Institute, New York
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Bryce Taylor · Adin Rimland, Pratt Institute, New York
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Bryce Taylor · Adin Rimland, Pratt Institute, New York
Lobende Erwähnung
Studio Ames, New York
Daisy Ames · Sarah Rutland · Julie Perrone
Projekt: Ecētra
Projekt: Ecētra
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Studio Ames, New York
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Studio Ames, New York
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Studio Ames, New York
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Studio Ames, New York
Lobende Erwähnung
Iarina Tava · Ana Porim, Rumänien
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Iarina Tava · Ana Porim, Rumänien
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Iarina Tava · Ana Porim, Rumänien
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Iarina Tava · Ana Porim, Rumänien
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Iarina Tava · Ana Porim, Rumänien
Lobende Erwähnung
Tsz Ming Wong, China
Projekt: Dwell Reform
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Tsz Ming Wong, China
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Tsz Ming Wong, China
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Tsz Ming Wong, China
-
Lobende Erwähnung: Tsz Ming Wong, China
Directors’ Choice
Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects, Chicago
Jordan Lutren
Projekt: [Up]Rooted
Projekt: [Up]Rooted
-
Directors’ Choice: Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects, Chicago
-
Directors’ Choice: Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects, Chicago
-
Directors’ Choice: Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects, Chicago
-
Directors’ Choice: Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects, Chicago
Directors’ Choice
WE Architecture, Kopenhagen
Lewis Williams
Projekt: The Playhouse
Projekt: The Playhouse
-
Directors’ Choice: WE Architecture, Kopenhagen
-
Directors’ Choice: WE Architecture, Kopenhagen
-
Directors’ Choice: WE Architecture, Kopenhagen
-
Directors’ Choice: WE Architecture, Kopenhagen
Directors’ Choice
John Vieweg, University of Michigan – Taubman College
-
Directors’ Choice: John Vieweg, University of Michigan – Taubman College
-
Directors’ Choice: John Vieweg, University of Michigan – Taubman College
-
Directors’ Choice: John Vieweg, University of Michigan – Taubman College
-
Directors’ Choice: John Vieweg, University of Michigan – Taubman College
Directors’ Choice
Jabili Sirineni · Ayaz Pasha · Vishweshwar Singh, Sri Venkateswara College of Architecture
Projekt: Make or Take Homes
-
Directors’ Choice: Jabili Sirineni · Ayaz Pasha · Vishweshwar Singh, Sri Venkateswara College of Architecture
-
Directors’ Choice: Jabili Sirineni · Ayaz Pasha · Vishweshwar Singh, Sri Venkateswara College of Architecture
-
Directors’ Choice: Jabili Sirineni · Ayaz Pasha · Vishweshwar Singh, Sri Venkateswara College of Architecture
-
Directors’ Choice: Jabili Sirineni · Ayaz Pasha · Vishweshwar Singh, Sri Venkateswara College of Architecture
Directors’ Choice
Meganom, Moskau
Vlad Kapustin
Projekt: Zephyr
Projekt: Zephyr
-
Directors’ Choice: Meganom, Moskau
-
Directors’ Choice: Meganom, Moskau
-
Directors’ Choice: Meganom, Moskau
-
Directors’ Choice: Meganom, Moskau
Directors’ Choice
Sabrina Xueyan Li, University of Pennsylvania
Projekt: Living as Moving and Moving as Living
-
Directors’ Choice: Sabrina Xueyan Li, University of Pennsylvania
-
Directors’ Choice: Sabrina Xueyan Li, University of Pennsylvania
-
Directors’ Choice: Sabrina Xueyan Li, University of Pennsylvania
-
Directors’ Choice: Sabrina Xueyan Li, University of Pennsylvania
Verfahrensart
Offener Ideenwettbewerb
Wettbewerbsaufgabe
The HOME competition invites all designers to explore ideas of domestic architecture for the future. Designers may consider the impacts of global population shifts, proximity of major cities to coastlines, new materials and building techniques, as well as the rise of co-housing, tiny homes, smart houses and marketplaces like Airbnb.
HOME creates a platform to speculate the ways new technological, political, environmental and cultural changes can redefine the spaces where we live.
What do you believe will be the future of home?
Offener Ideenwettbewerb
Wettbewerbsaufgabe
The HOME competition invites all designers to explore ideas of domestic architecture for the future. Designers may consider the impacts of global population shifts, proximity of major cities to coastlines, new materials and building techniques, as well as the rise of co-housing, tiny homes, smart houses and marketplaces like Airbnb.
HOME creates a platform to speculate the ways new technological, political, environmental and cultural changes can redefine the spaces where we live.
What do you believe will be the future of home?
HOME competition 2018
Organizers
The Home Competition 2018 by arch out loud
Competition Contact
General Inquiries:
info@thehomecompetition.com
Competition Assignment
“People who build their own home tend to be very courageous. These people are curious about life. They’re thinking about what it means to live in a house, rather than just buying a commodity and making it work.” – Tom Kundig
The Home remains the most significant architectural place we experience throughout our lives. Home represents safety, ownership, privacy, and stability. Home is where we can be alone and with people we care about most. Historically, the home has been a place of permanence. Despite how chaotic our lives are, we cherish the consistency of sleeping in the same bed and performing the same daily rituals here. Yet, new trends in digitalization and globalization continue to reshape realms of everyday life and alter our physical environments, including our homes. It is important to examine how we adapt our living spaces to these shifts.
From Reyner Banham’s critique, “A Home Is not a House”, to Wallace Neff’s Bubble Homes, architects and designers have continuously investigated the role our homes play in our lives. The HOME competition invites all designers to explore ideas of domestic architecture for the future. Designers may consider the impacts of global population shifts, proximity of major cities to coastlines, new materials and building techniques, as well as the rise of co-housing, tiny homes, smart houses and marketplaces like Airbnb. HOME creates a platform to speculate the ways new technological, political, environmental and cultural changes can redefine the spaces where we live.
What do you believe will be the future of home?
Competition Type
Open ideas competition
Admission Area
International
Participants
Architects and designers
Schedule
Competition Release: Feb. 01, 2018
$40 Advanced Entry Begins: Feb. 01, 2018
$40 Advanced Entry Ends: Apr. 02, 2018
$60 Early Entry Begins: Apr. 03, 2018
$60 Early Entry Ends: Jun. 04, 2018
$80 Final Entry Begins: Jun. 05, 2018
$80 Final Entry Ends: Jul. 31, 2018
Submission Deadline: Aug. 01, 2018
Results Announced: Aug. 31, 2018
Jury
- Jimenez Lai, Bureau Spectacular
- Liam Young, Tomorrow’s Thoughts Today, Unknown Fields
- Ivi Diamantopoulou, New Affiliates
- Andrew Zago, Zago Architecture
- Jason Payne, Hirsuta
- David Benjamin, The Living
- Anne Lise Kjaer, Kjaer Global
- On behalf of S/he_new-territories / François Roche
- Carlo Ratti, Carlo Ratti Associati
Awards
Overall Winner: $2,500
Innovation Award: $1,000
Adaptability Award: $1,000
Pragmatic Award: $1,000
Total Awards: $5,500
Requirements
The only requirement of the Home competition is that proposals must examine the performance of a single unit. Designers can propose a unit that is part of a larger system or structure but their submission must detail how that single unit will be used.
Proposals can create a small single family home, multi family building, or adaptable structure, but no matter the scale, they must clearly represent the experience of one unit for living within the project.
Designers can propose any geographical location for their home design but should consider the relationship between their proposal and its siting. Additionally, designers can propose siteless homes.
Submission Materials: (4) 12″ x 12″ graphic representations submitted as a combined PDF document. (1) 200 word maximum project summary, submitted as PDF document. Graphic representations may not include bodies of text but may include titles, labels, minor descriptions, etc. Graphic representations may include, but are not limited to, axons, perspectives, renderings, plans, sections, elevations, etc.
More information and details at
thehomecompetition.com
Organizers
The Home Competition 2018 by arch out loud
Competition Contact
General Inquiries:
info@thehomecompetition.com
Competition Assignment
“People who build their own home tend to be very courageous. These people are curious about life. They’re thinking about what it means to live in a house, rather than just buying a commodity and making it work.” – Tom Kundig
The Home remains the most significant architectural place we experience throughout our lives. Home represents safety, ownership, privacy, and stability. Home is where we can be alone and with people we care about most. Historically, the home has been a place of permanence. Despite how chaotic our lives are, we cherish the consistency of sleeping in the same bed and performing the same daily rituals here. Yet, new trends in digitalization and globalization continue to reshape realms of everyday life and alter our physical environments, including our homes. It is important to examine how we adapt our living spaces to these shifts.
From Reyner Banham’s critique, “A Home Is not a House”, to Wallace Neff’s Bubble Homes, architects and designers have continuously investigated the role our homes play in our lives. The HOME competition invites all designers to explore ideas of domestic architecture for the future. Designers may consider the impacts of global population shifts, proximity of major cities to coastlines, new materials and building techniques, as well as the rise of co-housing, tiny homes, smart houses and marketplaces like Airbnb. HOME creates a platform to speculate the ways new technological, political, environmental and cultural changes can redefine the spaces where we live.
What do you believe will be the future of home?
Competition Type
Open ideas competition
Admission Area
International
Participants
Architects and designers
Schedule
Competition Release: Feb. 01, 2018
$40 Advanced Entry Begins: Feb. 01, 2018
$40 Advanced Entry Ends: Apr. 02, 2018
$60 Early Entry Begins: Apr. 03, 2018
$60 Early Entry Ends: Jun. 04, 2018
$80 Final Entry Begins: Jun. 05, 2018
$80 Final Entry Ends: Jul. 31, 2018
Submission Deadline: Aug. 01, 2018
Results Announced: Aug. 31, 2018
Jury
- Jimenez Lai, Bureau Spectacular
- Liam Young, Tomorrow’s Thoughts Today, Unknown Fields
- Ivi Diamantopoulou, New Affiliates
- Andrew Zago, Zago Architecture
- Jason Payne, Hirsuta
- David Benjamin, The Living
- Anne Lise Kjaer, Kjaer Global
- On behalf of S/he_new-territories / François Roche
- Carlo Ratti, Carlo Ratti Associati
Awards
Overall Winner: $2,500
Innovation Award: $1,000
Adaptability Award: $1,000
Pragmatic Award: $1,000
Total Awards: $5,500
Requirements
The only requirement of the Home competition is that proposals must examine the performance of a single unit. Designers can propose a unit that is part of a larger system or structure but their submission must detail how that single unit will be used.
Proposals can create a small single family home, multi family building, or adaptable structure, but no matter the scale, they must clearly represent the experience of one unit for living within the project.
Designers can propose any geographical location for their home design but should consider the relationship between their proposal and its siting. Additionally, designers can propose siteless homes.
Submission Materials: (4) 12″ x 12″ graphic representations submitted as a combined PDF document. (1) 200 word maximum project summary, submitted as PDF document. Graphic representations may not include bodies of text but may include titles, labels, minor descriptions, etc. Graphic representations may include, but are not limited to, axons, perspectives, renderings, plans, sections, elevations, etc.
More information and details at
thehomecompetition.com